Hello, is the proxy listening on 10080?
I haven't looked yet at the chance to return 2, but when I did the work for gruu, some changes were done to rr module not to detect as strict routing and everything seemed fine for this case.
Can you test with a version before the return 2 addition just to see if the $du is set?
Cheers, Daniel On 4/18/13 5:15 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
my proxy (master version) receives this kind of ack to invite: ACK sip:[email protected];gr=urn:uuid:eea2f222-60b6-4ba1-a764-99cc0eb3ba9f SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:Wvip1a55myyd/[email protected]:10080;transport=ws;lr> Via: SIP/2.0/WS gammj1mb37kg.invalid;branch=z9hG4bK6981394 Max-Forwards: 69 To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=hosudd4jlh From: "Test" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=k808o8t8np Call-ID: edbrqn9t6jbvf749ajil CSeq: 2850 ACK Supported: path, outbound, gruu User-Agent: JsSIP 0.3.0 Content-Length: 0 i call loose_route() on it, which returns 2 (route calculation based on flow-token has been successful) and after that $ru/$du are Apr 18 17:56:44 siika /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[14517]: INFO: ru/du = <sip:[email protected];gr=urn:uuid:eea2f222-60b6-4ba1-a764-99cc0eb3ba9f>/<sip:[email protected]:10080;transport=ws;lr> why is $du set when there is only one route header denoting the proxy itself? how can i now test that routing should be based on r-uri, when $du gets set for no reason? -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
