I am saying that record-route()/loose_route() doesn't do anything with
GRUU when outbound is used right now.
I am not sure what the right changes would be. But there might be
something easy you can do to avoid the problem for now.
Changing the code to add a custom parameter isn't a good idea as it will
be outside of any RFC specification. I think whatever is in the code
should be based on the RFCs. So if you want to do something to work
around it with custom parameters as you have suggested I think this
should be done entirely on the config file side of things.
Regards,
Peter
On 25/04/13 10:24, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Peter Dunkley writes:
If you don't want Record-Route:/Route: based routing why not just not
add the Record-Route:s?
i didn't understand. i have to add record-router header pointing to
proxy/registrar 1 when invite is forwarded to proxy/registrar 2.
without gruu this has worked fine just by calling record_route().
are you now suggesting that gruu cannot be handled automatically by
record_route() call and that i need to use record_route_preset(string
[,string2]) instead?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
