28 apr 2013 kl. 21:46 skrev Juha Heinanen <[email protected]>: > Peter Dunkley writes: > >> This sounds like a bug with the outbound specification. I can't believe >> that the ability to re-target dialogs would be deliberately removed by the >> outbound enhancement without it being mentioned in the RFC. > > my opinion about outbound rfc is that its only useful bits are > requirement to register via at least two proxies and that ua has to take > care of keepalives. the flow token stuff is useless and, as i > mentioned, breaks rfc3261. gruu (or if not supported, contact aliasing) > is the solution for getting in-dialog requests to registered UAs. > >> Perhaps the right thing to do would be to raise this issue on the >> appropriate IETF mailing lists and seeing if the designers of the >> specification have an opinion rather than just using a proprietary >> solution like contact aliasing? > > i'm out of that loop myself. perhaps someone else on this list is on > some of the ietf or sip implementors mailing lists. >
Considering how many years it took to complete SIP outbound I'm surprised over this issue. The flow-token needs to change. /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
