Peter Dunkley writes: > If you look at the recent (yesterday and today) discussion on DISPATCH > the conclusion appears to be that this is how it should work and that > RFC 5626 should have been clearer on the behaviour.
i read the discussion and don't understand why would route set change. if ua looses connection to its proxy, it sets up a new one, but the proxy (which is in the route set established by r-r headers) is still the same. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
