30 apr 2013 kl. 20:16 skrev Juha Heinanen <[email protected]>: > Peter Dunkley writes: > >> If you look at the recent (yesterday and today) discussion on DISPATCH >> the conclusion appears to be that this is how it should work and that >> RFC 5626 should have been clearer on the behaviour. > > i read the discussion and don't understand why would route set change. > if ua looses connection to its proxy, it sets up a new one, but the > proxy (which is in the route set established by r-r headers) is still > the same.
If you are using edge proxys separate from the registrar, the new registration may come through another edge proxy, so the gruu will resolve in a new path to the client, which replaces the existing route through the possibly dead edge proxy. /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
