Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > in my tests, the change that i made has worked fine. in which case > > would it fail? > if you define the trees with module parameters, then you have to use > different tables in database, one for each. Those tables don't need > tname column.
i have not found such a constraint in the readme. is my patch somehow conflicting the current readme? > If you just store all the trees in one table (which has tname column), > then don't define them in the config, just set the table where they are > stored. A reload command will reload all the trees in that table the trees may have different types. how can you tell that without mtree parameter? after the patch, one db table can have many trees each defined separately by mtree parameter. does that break something in the readme? -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
