Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > It is no a problem to add a patch that will enhance for defining trees > that load from a table that has tname, But should not break the other one.
which case it is that the patch breaks? perhaps it is possible to enhance the patch avoid breaking existing behavior. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
