On 07/17/2014 04:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 07/17/2014 03:53 PM, Fred Posner wrote: > >> The question is very difficult to answer, for the reasons Alex >> explained.... >> >> The core of Kamailio is an RFC3261 SIP Server. >> >> Adding or using different modules will to the list of RFCs... such as >> with CPL module (RFC3880), invoking P-asserted-identity (RFC3325), using >> DNS NAPTR (RFC2915), Websockets (RFC6455), etc. > > I assume that what's actually going on here is that someone's > boss/management/client/stakeholder made the arbitrary requirement, > however nonsensical it is to us engineers, to list the RFCs supported > and compare them that way. > > In that case, a political solution is required, not a technically > accurate one. And the political solution is to list as many pertinent > RFCs as possible. This is useful: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5411/?include_text=1 > > I encourage you to look at the title of that RFC and ponder why it > exists, and consider my answer in that light. It wasn't meant to be > hostile or standoffish. It's just the reality. > > -- Alex >
I do want to write a module to make Kamailio RFC 2324 compliant, but am waiting for the proper hardware. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2324/?include_text=1 --fred _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
