Working a bit on dialog and looking at the archive to see what was reported about it, I noticed this message sent a while back.

Is the issue still there or a fix was done meanwhile? I haven't seen any follow up to the email...

Cheers,
Daniel

On 04/06/14 18:50, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
I could not load the dialog module, because of a linking problem with the 
symbol destroy_dlg.

Found that it's declared "inline" twice which may cause an issue. With this 
change, that I don't dare to commit myself, I could load dialog and explore it. Can 
someone take a look at this, someone that understands dialog and stuff?

This was on OS/X.

Thanks
/O

diff --git a/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.h b/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.h
index 6994256..174ef15 100644
--- a/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.h
+++ b/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.h
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static inline void unlink_unsafe_dlg(dlg_entry_t *d_entry, 
dlg_cell_t *dlg)
   * \brief Destroy a dialog, run callbacks and free memory
   * \param dlg destroyed dialog
   */
-inline void destroy_dlg(dlg_cell_t *dlg);
+void destroy_dlg(dlg_cell_t *dlg);
/*!


_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda


_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to