THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

The following task has a new comment added:

FS#455 - PARAM_STR vs STR_PARAM 
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)

----------
Thanks, they were applied.

But the archive included the patches from the old group as well, failing to 
apply them easily. Don't sent again old patches on a new tracker issue -- not 
easy to figure out they were old and spent time to look at all.

I will try soon without STR_PARAM, once I get to a system where I can compile 
all modules. Perhaps we should replace INT_PARAM with PARAM_INT to get 
everything to coherent parameter type naming.
----------

More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=455#comment1570

You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray 
bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't want to 
receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL 
shown above.

_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to