On 17 Sep 2014, at 12:54, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> historically 'tm' stays for 'transaction management' -- the the x for the 
> other module was for eXtensions.
> 
> The new module doesn't really do any management of transaction, but store 
> structures that include the id of transactions with custom info (at this 
> moment an AoR). It has a completely different hash table in memory (so 
> nothing new in tm structure). Internally it binds to tm to get some callbacks 
> executed, but also to registrar module for getting access to new branches.
> 
> Being in relation only with Transaction, storing some extra info for it, not 
> sure the 'm' makes sense to add.

The whole idea seems to be to manipulate a transaction - add a branch to an 
existing transaction, so the "m" certainly makes sense to me... ;-)

Cheers,
/O
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> On 17/09/14 12:36, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> In the list of modules, I would like if TSILO appears after TM and TMX - 
>> which is why I would suggest
>> we rename it to TM_SILO.
>> 
>> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/
>> 
>> /O
>> _______________________________________________
>> sr-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
> 
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com
> Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to