THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

The following task has a new comment added:

FS#468 - CANCEL sent shortly after '100 trying' response to INVITE does not 
always end the call
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)

----------
I pushed a patch to detect if the transaction was canceled during execution of 
branch_route and skip forwarding the branches.

- 
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=b66033d0546bf57cfb0cd16f1072da80c5a79d34

If you can test and report back the results, then I will backport, provided all 
is ok.

On the other hand, this INVITE-CANCEL-1xx race can happen even later. Like the 
process is losing the CPU just before writing the branch to the socket and the 
one that gets the CPU gets the CANCEL and processes it. In such case, the race 
will be caught later by one of the nodes (proxy, or even UA).

The UA should be prepared to handle CANCEL races anyhow, a 200ok can be on the 
wire towards it at the moment it sends CANCEL. Due to network transmission 
delays, it is impossible to avoid such races.

----------

More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=468#comment1650

You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray 
bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't want to 
receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL 
shown above.

_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to