Hi, My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always explicitly return 1 or exit.
— Muhammad. On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify. I > have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf. > Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some > cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching > headers. > > Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return > seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route > should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning -1. > > My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and > there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1 > (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core > cookbook indicates? > > Thanks in advance, > > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
