Thanks Muhammad, appreciate that clarification. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:10 PM, M S <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return > value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always > explicitly return 1 or exit. > > — > Muhammad. > On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify. >> I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf. >> Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some >> cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching >> headers. >> >> Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core# >> return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, >> the route should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning >> -1. >> >> My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, >> and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return >> -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core >> cookbook indicates? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Jeff >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- Jeff
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
