On a second thought, SIP Outbound is client-side oriented, so never mind, I guess.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Very thorough write up, as always. If only this article was available some > time ago when I was putting up an edge proxy, would have saved me weeks of > frustration in figuring out all these NAT-related aspects and RFC readings > (although such an exercise helps understand the problem to its core). > > What you may consider adding to your article is the option of the yet not > so popular, but in my opinion the "future of NAT-traveral" practice in IPv4 > networks, which is the SIP Outbound mechanism. > > Best regards, > --Sergiu > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Recent repeated questions on this topic have inspired a blog post: >> >> http://blog.csrpswitch.com/server-side-nat-traversal-with- >> kamailio-the-definitive-guide/ >> >> This is a rough cut, and may be edited or expanded later. >> >> -- >> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC >> >> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) >> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
