BTW, my quarrel with add_contact_alias() vs fix_nated_register() comes from
the fact that when forwarding registration onward, Asterisk for example
chooses to display the peer's host address as Kamailio's address instead of
the device's NATed address or even worse the Private address, which isn't
that convenient for a few reasons.

Perhaps somebody knows of a workaround.

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> wrote:

> On a second thought, SIP Outbound is client-side oriented, so never mind,
> I guess.
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Very thorough write up, as always. If only this article was available
>> some time ago when I was putting up an edge proxy, would have saved me
>> weeks of frustration in figuring out all these NAT-related aspects and RFC
>> readings (although such an exercise helps understand the problem to its
>> core).
>>
>> What you may consider adding to your article is the option of the yet not
>> so popular, but in my opinion the "future of NAT-traveral" practice in IPv4
>> networks, which is the SIP Outbound mechanism.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --Sergiu
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Recent repeated questions on this topic have inspired a blog post:
>>>
>>> http://blog.csrpswitch.com/server-side-nat-traversal-with-ka
>>> mailio-the-definitive-guide/
>>>
>>> This is a rough cut, and may be edited or expanded later.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>>>
>>> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
>>> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to