Another bit of data:

KDMQ messages flow in the wrong direction i.e. (Node B to A) only for dialog 
state: 5 updates.

And this happens after the actual KDMQ from A to B has already been ack'd with 
a 200 OK.

________________________________
From: sr-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Patrick 
Murphy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 4:43:28 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DMQ with dialog: KDMQ messages being looped back to the 
source


Hi Charles,


Yes I exit after the handle_dmq function in the request route.


I couldn't spot the looping this time (as it is intermittent), but here is the 
trace of messages that may indicate something weird or unexpected happening 
with DMQ:

The following message came from Node B to A (which should never have originated 
because only A is receiving calls). I am assuming KDMQ will only flow from A 
--> B followed by their acks from B.

KDMQ sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22af.6d4559b5000000.0
To: <sip:[email protected]:5060>
From: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=4d8de1338e3b915c083406d1267d5e7bg-1424
CSeq: 10 KDMQ
Call-ID: [email protected]
Content-Length: 50
User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux))
Max-Forwards: 1
Content-Type: application/json

{"action":3,"h_entry":3521,"h_id":23807,"state":5}


And Node A correctly responded with a 500 because it was not expecting this

SIP/2.0 500 Server Internal Error
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22af.6d4559b5000000.0;received=no.de.b.ip
To: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=7bf3c29789337c2087fcbd4083b8683d.147f
From: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=4d8de1338e3b915c083406d1267d5e7bg-1424
CSeq: 10 KDMQ
Call-ID: [email protected]
User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0




Regards,

Owais


________________________________
From: sr-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Charles 
Chance <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:46 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DMQ with dialog: KDMQ messages being looped back to the 
source

Hi Pat,

In your config, do you exit immediately after handle_dmq_message()?

Are you able to share with us one of the looped messages, both as it is 
received by B and then as it is sent back to A?

Cheers,

Charles


On 24 July 2018 at 16:05, Patrick Murphy 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

I am using Kamailio 5.1.1 with DMQ with the following config (relevant parts) 
on 2 nodes.

Node A:
modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1)
modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:no.de.a.ip:5060")
modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:myvoip.local")
modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1)


Node B:
modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1)
modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:no.de.b.ip:5060")
modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:myvoip.local")
modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1)

"myvoip.local" is a DNS A record that resolves to both the IPs of A and B.

I have the dmq_handle_message(); called if method is of type "KDMQ" in the 
request_route.

Now, in order to test it, I only sent a few calls only on node A.
KDMQ messages flowed to node B and dialog state replicated. But I noticed, node 
B was randomly sending one of the KDMQ dialog messages back to A and receiving 
a 500 "Server Internal Error" back from node A... (for a subset of those calls, 
not all).

Why would this be the case when the nodes correctly recognize their local 
status by the "local: 1" set as seen from dmq.list_nodes

Anyone else experienced this? What could I be doing wrong?


Thanks,
Pat.


_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered 
office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham 
Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to