Hello, I have just pushed a fix to master branch and also backported to 5.1.
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/a84a3ea618f0e602a8892c37fce7f4e72ab7371c https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/e2eda1376def48ab1c78db7a766c1811d19205be Please confirm if it fixes your issue. Cheers, Charles On 25 July 2018 at 10:31, Patrick Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Another bit of data: > > KDMQ messages flow in the wrong direction i.e. (Node B to A) only for > dialog state: 5 updates. > > And this happens after the actual KDMQ from A to B has already been ack'd > with a 200 OK. > ------------------------------ > *From:* sr-users <[email protected]> on behalf of > Patrick Murphy <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 24, 2018 4:43:28 PM > > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] DMQ with dialog: KDMQ messages being looped > back to the source > > > Hi Charles, > > > Yes I exit after the handle_dmq function in the request route. > > > I couldn't spot the looping this time (as it is intermittent), but here is > the trace of messages that may indicate something weird or unexpected > happening with DMQ: > > > The following message came from Node B to A (which should never have > originated because only A is receiving calls). I am assuming KDMQ will only > flow from A --> B followed by their acks from B. > > KDMQ sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22af.6d4559b5000000.0 > To: <sip:[email protected]:5060> > From: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=4d8de1338e3b915c083406d1267d5e > 7bg-1424 > CSeq: 10 KDMQ > Call-ID: [email protected] > Content-Length: 50 > User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux)) > Max-Forwards: 1 > Content-Type: application/json > > {"action":3,"h_entry":3521,"h_id":23807,"state":5} > > > And Node A correctly responded with a 500 because it was not expecting this > > SIP/2.0 500 Server Internal Error > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22af.6d4559b5000000.0; > received=no.de.b.ip > To: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=7bf3c29789337c2087fcbd4083b8683d.147f > From: <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=4d8de1338e3b915c083406d1267d5e > 7bg-1424 > CSeq: 10 KDMQ > Call-ID: [email protected] > User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.1 (x86_64/linux)) > Content-Length: 0 > > > > Regards, > > Owais > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* sr-users <[email protected]> on behalf of > Charles Chance <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:46 PM > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] DMQ with dialog: KDMQ messages being looped > back to the source > > Hi Pat, > > In your config, do you exit immediately after handle_dmq_message()? > > Are you able to share with us one of the looped messages, both as it is > received by B and then as it is sent back to A? > > Cheers, > > Charles > > > On 24 July 2018 at 16:05, Patrick Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using Kamailio 5.1.1 with DMQ with the following config (relevant > parts) on 2 nodes. > > Node A: > modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1) > modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:no.de.a.ip:5060") > modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:myvoip.local") > modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) > > > Node B: > modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1) > modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:no.de.b.ip:5060") > modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:myvoip.local") > modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) > > "myvoip.local" is a DNS A record that resolves to both the IPs of A and B. > > I have the dmq_handle_message(); called if method is of type "KDMQ" in the > request_route. > > Now, in order to test it, I only sent a few calls only on node A. > KDMQ messages flowed to node B and dialog state replicated. But I noticed, > node B was randomly sending one of the KDMQ dialog messages back to A and > receiving a 500 "Server Internal Error" back from node A... (for a subset > of those calls, not all). > > Why would this be the case when the nodes correctly recognize their local > status by the "local: 1" set as seen from dmq.list_nodes > > Anyone else experienced this? What could I be doing wrong? > > > Thanks, > Pat. > > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered > office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, > Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB. > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
