Hi Daniel,

VoilĂ : https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2277

Thanks,
--Sergiu

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:31 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> better create a new issue, rather than adding comments to old merged PRs
> or closed issues, because they do not pop up in front on the web portal and
> likely the code has changed. In the new issue/PR, you can reference the old
> one if there are relevant details.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 07.04.20 17:25, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's been a while, had the chance to notice only now a live case
> involving rfc7335 private IPs. It appears as though either nat_uac_test()
> or more likely fix_nated_sdp() doesn't catch the 192.0.0.0/29 subnet as
> private.
>
> Added a comment including sip dump example to the closed PR, if someone
> has the desire to look into it,
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488
>
> Thanks,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:30 AM Daniel Tryba <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0100, Daniel Tryba wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 04:23:18PM -0400, John Petrini wrote:
>> > > If you're asking if nat_uac_test should be updated to check for
>> 192.0.0.0/29
>> > > I think that's a great idea.
>> ...
>> > I'm to lazy^W^Wdon't have the time to figure out how to do the
>> > appropriate git magic.S
>>
>> I lied:
>> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- 
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to