Actually, I was looking at the code yesterday, trying to figure it if
it's just a validation, to not accept reply_route(), or if it needs some
more logic to work inside that block. It's still an option.
Best regards,
Luis
On 4/9/20 4:25 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 09.04.20 09:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
[...]
Any idea why Async is not allowed in reply_route()?
Didn't notice this question in the first place to respond in my previous
email.
Probably the developer that did it needed it for SIP requests. However,
you can make a patch (pull request) to make it work for other cases. The
developers will review the changes and if they don't break anything, it
will be merged.
Cheers,
Daniel
.
--
Luis Rojas
Software Architect
Sixbell
Los Leones 1200
Providencia
Santiago, Chile
Phone: (+56-2) 22001288
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.sixbell.com
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
