Agreed. Just suggesting an extreme. On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:51, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:26:45PM +0100, David Villasmil wrote: > > > How about just not forwarding the 180 if it’s coming right after the > > 200ok? I know it’s a hack, but a 180 is a provisional response > > indicating the ring status, not the actual audio for the ring... so if > > a 200 is received, the call is already established, no need to forward > > the 180. > > There is a general principle, particularly in PSTN interworking, that > signalling should be reliably conserved end-to-end. I think dropping > messages is the most cavalier option available, perhaps worth > considering only if every other logical possibility has been exhausted > first. > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Regards, David Villasmil email: [email protected] phone: +34669448337
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
