I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. > For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for > other calls: via Ext2<->Int. > In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and > depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of > rtpproxy_manage(). > I didn't succeed to get the desired result. > On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: > Ext1: 192.168.0.31 > Ext2: 192.168.0.32 > Int: 10.159.65.1 > > When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets > that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the > Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the > decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table > information (?). > Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external > interface. > > Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary > to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize > addresses? > > Thank you in advance, > Leonid > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Regards, David Villasmil email: [email protected] phone: +34669448337
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
