Can you elaborate a little? I didn't understand you. Best regards, Leonid
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM David Villasmil < [email protected]> wrote: > I think mapping IPs is a one-to-one relationship > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 16:18, Leonid Fainshtein < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. >> For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for >> other calls: via Ext2<->Int. >> In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, >> and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of >> rtpproxy_manage(). >> I didn't succeed to get the desired result. >> On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: >> Ext1: 192.168.0.31 >> Ext2: 192.168.0.32 >> Int: 10.159.65.1 >> >> When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the >> packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the >> Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the >> decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table >> information (?). >> Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one >> external interface. >> >> Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary >> to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize >> addresses? >> >> Thank you in advance, >> Leonid >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > -- > Regards, > > David Villasmil > email: [email protected] > phone: +34669448337 > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
