I understand the reasoning, but there are still architectural limits to the number of useful worker processes, and I think you are exceeding them by quite a lot. — Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Aug 16, 2024, at 10:24 AM, elhar.mohamed--- via sr-users > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Alex, > Thank you for your reply. > I'm running the test in redhat VM which have 6 CPUs. > > why we're using this big number of workers it's because for the invites that > will be handled with async workers needs to do enum queries with extarnal dns > server which has a delay between 20ms and 300ms. > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
