Hi Daniel, On 26/10/2011 04:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i") and then right after ds_mark_dst("p"), a >> log is printed saying that you cannot put a destination into probing >> state when it is marked as inactive. > are you sure you run the devel version? There is no such case in the > sources -- send me exactly the log message you get. Only when the > destination is disabled the probing cannot be set, but not the same > case of inactive.
I think this may have been v3.2, I'm just looking through my log files and here is the error line: INFO: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2031]: Ignoring the request to set this destination to probing: It is already inactive! If I recall correctly, I first tried to do: ds_mark_dst("ip"); in routeing script, but that did not work, it set state to IX and not IP. Then I tried: ds_mark_dst("i"); ds_mark_dst("p"); Thats when I got the following message: INFO: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2031]: Ignoring the request to set this destination to probing: It is already inactive! >> >> Is it possible to set the state of a gateway to inactive-probing from >> the routing script? > > Yes, it should be, no constraint in master branch source code. I can see, from the docs, that if I just do ds_mark_dst(), then that will set state to IX (Inactive), however, as described above, I cannot set state to Inactive-Probing, from routing script using ds_mark_dst("ip"). Thanks _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users