Thank you for the replies, this has been helpful.
So if I do want to go down this road and want to practically implement a solution, what is the best method of appending additional record route headers to a 200 OK response? I guess, specifically, adding them to the 200 OK response that is given by kamailio to a re-invite. Thank you, Jack Davis On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:44:31PM -0600, Jack Davis wrote: > > > What kind of problems can arise from inserting said header? > > Theoretically, none. It should be ignored, as per the RFC. Moreover, the > RFC doesn't _prohibit_ such a header in an in-dialog request, so you are > probably clear to add it. Fundamentally, ยง 12.2 says: > > Requests within a dialog MAY contain Record-Route and Contact header > fields. However, these requests do not cause the dialog's route set > to be modified... > > I have certainly seen instances in the field where RRs in in-dialog > requests are not ignored, however. That's on the endpoints, of course, > but it can make things worse. > > > I'm trying to find a way to get a pesky setup to start behaving, of > course, > > without requiring them to make any changes. > > That's always a tough gig. > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users