Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Samma-Sambuddhassa!
GARUDHAMMAS - THE GENDER DYNAMIC1
© Rasika Wijayratne   ♦   Email: [email protected]   ♦   Version: 1.0   ♦   
Date 
Created: 6 Jan 2011   ♦   Date Modified: 6 Jan 2011  

Men and women are not equal. This is what most people, especially in the West, 
have trouble grasping especially due to their cultural background and heritage. 
So when they approach an Eastern tradition like Buddhism and come across 
something like the Garudhamma rules instituted by the Lord Buddha, they 
instantly react against it. Although this is understandable, it is never wise 
or 
skilful.
The Garudhamma rules were first given by the Lord Buddha to Maha-Pajapati 
Gotami 
on admission to the Order as the first female bhikkhuni (higher ordained nun) 
with the establishment of the female Sangha. These 8 sacred rules were given as 
a part of her higher ordination and also became part of the female monastic 
Vinaya rules for all bhikkhunis (Buddhist nuns), starting with Maha-Pajapati 
Gotami as the first nun. Even though the rules were formally given to 
Maha-Pajapati Gotami, it is understood that it applies to all bhikkhunis and it 
is even clear from the way they are worded, "A nun should...".  These eight 
rules are only there for bhikkhunis and not for bhikkhus (Buddhist monks). This 
inequality is what upsets some, especially those from the West.
It is true that an inequality is there. However it is also true that men and 
women, whether one likes to accept it or not, are not equal. This is why this 
inequality exists in the rules. It is the inability to grasp and accept this 
basic truth regarding the inequality between men and women that has given rise 
to this whole debate over whether the Garudhammas should or should not exist in 
the Dhamma, whether they were or were not instituted by the Lord Buddha and 
whether sections of the Tipitaka are authentic or not, especially in relation 
to 
the Garudhammas. This inability to see, grasp and understand that significant 
differences exist between men and women and that therefore they are not equal, 
goes to the heart and root of this whole debate and issue. So it makes sense to 
try and understand these differences and to also accept and come to terms with 
them.
It is obvious to anyone with even an average level of insight and knowledge 
that 
males and females have differences physically, emotionally, mentally, 
behaviourally and societally. The physical differences are obvious. It is also 
a 
well-known fact that the kinds and levels of hormones (the main ones being 
testosterone in men and oestrogen in women) that activate inside the body 
affecting emotions, mood, etc. are different in men and women. These in turn 
differently affect thinking, behaviour and impact on attributes significant to 
mental training such as energy, confidence, etc.
The differences between men and women in society, in the East or West, are even 
more significant. The 2010 Catalyst U.S. Women in Business report found that 
only 2.4% of Fortune 500 CEOs are women!2This is in the USA, a Western society 
that purports to be egalitarian (equal) in every aspect when it comes to women. 
It becomes clear from this single example alone, of which there are many, that 
even in the West, which constantly talks about gender equality, there isn't 
much 
equality in reality. So it is fair to say that even Western societies are male 
dominated, even though most would not wish to acknowledge it due to factors 
such 
as 'political correctness' and the laws of the land.
Eastern cultures are openly male dominated by contrast and make no attempts to 
hide this fact. In Buddhist countries in the East such as Sri Lanka, women 
enjoy 
the same levels of equality as enjoyed by women in the West with equal access 
to 
education, work opportunities, health care, etc. However being an openly male 
dominated society, it is understood and accepted that in the family home and in 
society that the males play a dominant role while the females play a supportive 
role to the male. This also prevalent in Western societies, even though it is 
politically incorrect and even against the law to openly state it.
Being male dominated does not in any way refer to the mistreatment of women by 
men as happens in some societies through subjugation, torture, sexual 
mistreatment, etc. In a male dominated society both women and women understand 
the nature of their relationship and live in that way by choice, seeing the 
advantages in it, rather than by force. Women are treated with dignity and 
respect and their wishes are respected at all times. It is important to make 
this distinction clear.
Historically most societies such as the Hebrew, Greek, Roman, Indian, and 
Chinese were male dominated. However some especially in the West, attempted to 
adopt egalitarianism (gender equality).3 The West maybe egalitarian 'on paper,' 
but not in reality. So gender-egalitarianism, the view that males and females 
can ever be equal, contradicts reality, the way thing really are, in short it 
contradicts the Dhamma, as is evident in both the East as well as the West. So 
in reality most Eastern and Western societies are still male dominated, but 
only 
the East is willing to openly acknowledge it.
In the Bahudhatuka Sutta, the Lord Buddha says that only a male may become a 
Sammasambuddha, Wheel-turning Monarch, Sakka, Mara or Brahma thus: "It is 
impossible, it cannot happen that a woman could be an Accomplished One, a Fully 
Enlightened One (Sammasambuddha) ... a Wheel–turning Monarch... that a woman 
could occupy the position of Sakka ... Mara ... Brahma - there is no such 
possibility (while in the form of a woman, however through rebirth as a male it 
is possible). It is possible that a man might be an Accomplished One, a Fully 
Enlightened One ... a Wheel-turning Monarch... that a man might occupy the 
position of Sakka ... Mara ... Brahma – there is such a possibility."4 

Going beyond the these other realms and even looking at the animal realm this 
gender imbalance again becomes evident among most mammalian species, viz. 
"Female-biased dominance occurs rarely in mammals, and it is only observed 
consistently in hyenas and lemurs."5 A questions that arises is, among lions 
for 
example where the males are dominant, what would would happen if females tried 
to be equal or dominant to the males? Would it create harmony or disharmony in 
the group of lions? The same question can be applied to other areas such as the 
Sangha and the family unit.
It is true that the concentrated or enlightened mind on its own is above gender 
distinctions. But it must be remembered this is following enlightenment, not 
before where gender where gender is very much relevant. To gain concentration 
(samadhi) and then enlightenment (Nibbana), one must first be established 
virtue 
(sila). This is where the Garudhamma rules have their place. They were 
instituted by the Lord Buddha first for Maha-Pajapati Gotami and then other 
bhikkhunis as a way of restraining gender specific unskilful qualities from 
arising that would compromise their and others' training, affecting 
concentration (samadhi) and thus also enlightenment (Nibbana). Here gender 
specific unskilful qualities refers to the female desire to be on par with or 
even higher than males. This directly contradicts the reality of the inequality 
that exists between males and females. So the Garudhamma rules were instituted 
out of compassion for bhikkhunis, understanding the differences between 
genders, 
and not to degrade or subjugate females as some have misunderstood. 

The Lord Buddha being full enlightened was fully aware of the gender 
differences, would have instituted these rules only for female also out of 
pragmatic reasons and thinking of the harmony of the Sangha community. A fully 
Self Enlightened One does not discriminate but acts pragmatically for the 
benefit and welfare of all. He would have understood the universal nature of 
this gender dynamic, that the males are dominant is every aspect, physically, 
emotionally, mentally, societally in most societies and even across other 
realms 
such as the Diving and animal realms. He would have also understood that if he 
did not institutionalise a set of rules such as the Garudhammas, that some 
would 
attempt to bring gender egalitarianism to the Sangha, as was attempted in 
Western societies. This would contradict the prevalent reality (Dhamma) of the 
gender dynamic and would thus create disharmony in the Sangha. As he foresaw 
2600 years ago when he instituted the sacred Garudhamma rules, isn't this very 
thing happening today in the Sangha community with various attempts at removing 
the Garudhamma rules in preference for 'modern' (and misguided) 
gender-egalitarianism?
May the true Dhamma remain uncorrupted and last for 10,000 years for the 
benefit 
of present and future generations. May you gain the wisdom and strength protect 
it from all present and future threats!

Notes
1. Please contact the author to obtain the latest version of this document.
2. See New U.S. Women in Business Statistics Released by Catalyst here 
http://www.womenonbusiness.com/new-us-women-in-business-statistics-released-by-catalyst/and
 here http://www.catalyst.org/publication/132/us-women-in-business 

        * Percentage    of women in the U.S. labor force: 46.3%
        * Percentage    of women in management, professional and related 
occupations: 
50.6%
        * Percentage    of female Fortune 500 corporate officers: 15.4%
        * Percentage    of female Fortune 500 board seats: 14.8%
        * Percentage    of female Fortune 500 top earners: 6.7%
        * Percentage    of female Fortune 500 CEOs: 2.4%
3. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarchy
4. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha, A Translation of the Majjihma 
Nikaya, Translated by Bhikkhu Nanamoli and Bhikkhu Bodhi, pp 929.
5. See 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy#Female_dominance_in_mammals 


Dhamma (Buddhist) Portal Websites
1. AccessToInsight.orgsee http://www.accesstoinsight.org
2. What-Buddha-Said.netsee http://what-buddha-said.net
3. Metta.lksee http://www.metta.lk
4. What-Buddha-Taught.netsee http://what-buddha-taught.net
5. Buddhanet.netsee http://www.buddhanet.net
6. Vihara.org.ausee http://www.vihara.org.au
7. DhammaGroup.tksee http://www.dhammagroup.tk


      

-- 
******************************************************
This is the Best Sri Lankan E-Mail Group.
******************************************************
IF you like to join us, 
Go to,
http://groups.google.lk/group/sricom/boxsubscribe

visit this group at 
http://groups.google.lk/group/sricom

***************:::www.SriNet.lk:::******************
******************************************************
=====================================================================
List-Subscribe      :Send a Email to : [email protected]
List-Unsubscribe  : Send a Email to : [email protected]

=====================================================================
http://www.srinet.lk/

Reply via email to