On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Chris D.Halverson wrote:
> Ranbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In my understanding, SSH is a good replacement for telnet and ftp
> > tools while OpenSSH is a replacement for remote tools such as rlogin.
> No. OpenSSH is an implementation of the ssh protocol. Commercial ssh
> (via ssh.com) is another. It just so happens to be the "reference"
> protocol, although the protocol is now an RFC. OpenSSH has the same
> functionality as traditional "ssh", at least for the most part.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Known differences??? (Other than bugs, which seem to be pretty
much orthogonal between the two.)
> cdh
> --
> Chris D. Halverson Complete Internet Solutions
> PGP mail accepted, see web page for key http://www.CompleteIS.com/~cdh/
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
