> Pete,
Why is the pic all fuzzy - whoops, I forgot to put on my specs, ah, that's better. Great photo indeed, came in on full 17" screen. Even with wind up--I mean dial up, it d/led in less than a minute. My computer shows it as 616K. What I don't understand is that I have other photos pulled off the internet and from my own camera that are equally clear and are all well under 100K and came in much more quickly. Explain! Geoff > > I feel that often a pic is worth a 1000 words > >Bert, Tony, > >No argument from me there - but the problem is that many folk are new to >digital photography, and some don't have a clue how to reduce a >photo from 2048 >x 1536 (which is how it comes out of their camera) to the 640 x 480 which is >reasonable for a pic here among the text. > >I've attached the original of that pic I put in my last post - see how long >it takes to download and how big it is on your screen. > >I'll take either option - just expressing a personal preference. > >Pete > >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: P1010009.JPG >Type: image/jpeg >Size: 629592 bytes >Desc: not available >Url : >http://postfix.45mm.com/pipermail/sslivesteam/attachments/20051027/515ab6e6/P1010009.jpe >_______________________________________________ >SSLiveSteam mailing list >Send messages: [email protected] >Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/sslivesteam >Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html _______________________________________________ SSLiveSteam mailing list Send messages: [email protected] Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/sslivesteam Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html
