>Ron,

I meant what he did for the hobby,- not his  offensiveness!!

I'll really try to have good memories of you, and I'll put them on 
the SiTG site when I am able to send a message to it!!

Geoff.

>Good for you, Geoff. I wish I had some good memories of Tom,
>but alas....he seemed to offend everyone. I do appreciate what
>he did for our hobby, though.
>
>I sure hope that when I'm gone people will have good memories
>of me!
>
>Ron
>
>
>On Jan 25, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Geoff Spenceley wrote:
>
>>  Ah, Tom Cooper, wotta fellow, I met him in Diamondhead once, he was
>>  on crutches, had a terrible trip and was in an awful mood.
>>
>>  However, he did a lot for our hobby years ago. The Merlin Hunslet I
>>  purchased in 1985 overall  was a strong, long  running loco with
>>  wonderful gas and regulator control.   The cupped "teflon" pistons
>>  lasted and lasted, the Merlin  Matterhorn lasted me well too. I sold
>>  both engines  a couple of years ago to  put a few dollars in my
>>  wallet towards the Duchess.  I suspect a book could be written about
>>  Tom!  "The Good,  The Bad and The Ugly!!" I remember the "Good"
>>  mostly!
>>
>>  Geoff
>>
>>>  So, Peter.....you're not a big fan of the Osmotor?.........8-)
>>>
>>>  I remember Tom Cooper coming to a steamup in PA
>>>  with his "Smokey Shay", and ticking off the host as
>>>  he sprayed diesel fuel all over everything within 3
>>>  feet in every direction. It ran out of steam every 10 feet
>>>  and had to sit there while it built up pressure again.
>>>  Not a very impressive demonstration.
>>>
>>>  Ron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Try another design.......Start out from scratch.......Anything 
>>>>  but an
>>>>   Osmotor!  As produced by Tom Cooper they were a total pig's ear,
>>>>   requiring
>>>>   upward of 100 hours of running to bed properly.  My buddy Bill
>>>>   Shipp has a
>>>>   Steamlines shay that is powered by an Osmotor, and after 100+ hours
>>>>   it is
>>>>   only now approaching a condition that could be described as
>>>>   'controllable'.
>>>>
>>>>   The problems are inherent in the design - the spring pressure to
>>>>   hold the
>>>>   cylinder against the port comes from the outside edges of the
>>>>   cylinder, not
>>>>   at the centre of rotation.  This compounds friction forces
>>>>   tremendously -
>>>>   not only the cylinder/port face friction found on every oscillator,
>>>>   but two
>>>>   additional moving points of friction on each cylinder as the spring
>>>>   holders
>>>>   move back and forth in an arc as the cylinder goes through a cycle.
>>>>
>>>>   All in all, a design best lost.
>>>>
>>>>   regards,
>>>>
>>>>   pf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>   SSLiveSteam mailing list
>>>>   Send messages: [email protected]
>>>>   Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/
>>>>   sslivesteam
>>>>   Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  SSLiveSteam mailing list
>>>  Send messages: [email protected]
>>>  Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/
>>>  sslivesteam
>>>  Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  SSLiveSteam mailing list
>>  Send messages: [email protected]
>>  Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/
>>  sslivesteam
>>  Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>SSLiveSteam mailing list
>Send messages: [email protected]
>Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/sslivesteam
>Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html

_______________________________________________
SSLiveSteam mailing list
Send messages: [email protected]
Cancel subscription: http://postfix.45mm.com/mailman/listinfo/sslivesteam
Rules: http://www.45mm.com/sslivesteam_guide.html

Reply via email to