On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > > Hi again, > > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16? > > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17 > rawhide. > > Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to > updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the > updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow. > > Please test them and give them karma at > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16 > > Ok, I will do it in the next days. > > I hope to be of help in reporting this. > By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this: > > * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in ldap > * Not built by default > * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality. > > So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my > sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup: > > (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options] (0x0400): > Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null) > (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init] (0x4000): > SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider [ldap].
This is harmless, the SSSD is just telling that the back end module contains sudo support[1]. Unless you actually configure the sudo provider and the sudo client binary, nothing is using it. [1] In more technical terms, that the shared library contains the symbol "ssm_ldap_sudo_init" which can be loaded with dlsym() _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
