On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 14:21 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Dne 7.2.2012 14:03, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
> >> <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>          On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> >>          <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>                  On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
> >>                  wrote:
> >>                  >  Hi again,
> >>                  >  What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> >>                  >  Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
> >>                  Fedora 17 rawhide.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                  Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
> >>                  to be pushed to
> >>                  updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
> >>                  turn up in the
> >>                  updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
> >>
> >>                  Please test them and give them karma at
> >>                  
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
> >>
> >>          Ok, I will do it in the next days.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I hope to be of help in reporting this.
> >> By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
> >>
> >>   * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in ldap
> >>   * Not built by default
> >>   * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
> >>
> >> So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
> >> sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
> >>
> >> (Tue Feb  7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
> >> (0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
> >> (Tue Feb  7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
> >> (0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
> >> [ldap].
> >
> > That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
> > However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
> > features enabled for testing.
> 
> Not exactly. The back end will still try to load sudo/autofs/ssh but the 
> providers does not support it and the responders are not built (without 
> proper configure flag).

Thanks for the clarification. Either way, as I said: the Fedora packages
will build with --enable-all-experimental-features.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Reply via email to