On 03/14/2014 10:59 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (08/03/14 19:11), Dmitri Pal wrote:
Hello,

The following patches address the request to be able to read config
data from a memory buffer rather than a file.
Ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2267

It also addresses a build problem that I found on my system and fixes
a tight loop in parsing when we ignore errors and file is empty.


--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
Red Hat Inc.


-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/



> From 05229bcdedf90e81991c9f907c6acca93292a93b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitri Pal<d...@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 18:59:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BUILD] Fixing build

The EXTRA_ prefix is not recognized by RHEL6 autotools.
---
Makefile.am |    2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 44a9dff..cb9008f 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ libini_config_la_SOURCES = \
     ini/ini_get_array_valueobj.c \
     ini/ini_list_valueobj.c \
     trace/trace.h
-EXTRA_libini_config_la_DEPENDENCIES = ini/libini_config.sym
+libini_config_la_DEPENDENCIES = ini/libini_config.sym
libini_config_la_LIBADD = \
     libcollection.la \
     libpath_utils.la \
--
1.7.1

NACK to this patch

It breaks parallel build. Build in koji will fail as well.

make -j4 V=0

//snip

   CC       ini/ini_get_valueobj.lo
   CC       ini/ini_get_array_valueobj.lo
   CC       ini/ini_list_valueobj.lo
   CCLD     libdhash.la
   CCLD     libpath_utils.la
   CCLD     libcollection.la
   CCLD     libref_array.la
   CCLD     libbasicobjects.la
   CCLD     libini_config.la
libtool: link: cannot find the library `libbasicobjects.la' or unhandled 
argument `libbasicobjects.la'
make[1]: *** [libini_config.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Leaving directory `/ding-libs'
make: *** [all] Error 2

We should use other solution proposed in mail
      https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2014-March/018758.html

There are not any warnings from static analysers.

I will do review of other patches later.

LS
As we discussed you can ignore this patch. It fixes my build environment so I will keep it private but I need because otherwise I can't build anything.

--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
Red Hat Inc.


-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/



_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Reply via email to