On 11/12/2014 05:02 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: ...
I also took a look at the FreeIPA design pages: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Feature_template and they also include a section called "Test Plan". I personally don't think there is too much value in having a separate test plan and how to test, but I'm fine with discussing it if other developers feel differently.
These sections are for different audience. While "How to Test" page is to explain how *users* should set up and play with the feature, "Test Plan" is a section purely for QE to list the Test Cases. Not all features are expected to have this section unless downstream QE requests it.
"Test Plan" may typically for example contain negative tests or input tests while admins would not care much about this.
What do you think about the template? Do you agree?
I like the template! I am just thinking, would it make sense to add "Feature Management" section as in FreeIPA template? You can name it differently, but the point is to document and highlight what are the configuration options enabling or controlling the feature.
Martin _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
