On (25/02/15 08:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:16:09PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (24/02/15 19:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:52:26PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >> On (24/02/15 16:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> >> > >> >> >the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 cmocka and adds >> >> >compatible definitions in the first patch and uses them to convert a >> >> >single unit test. >> >> > >> >> >I found the approach ugly myself, so much that I'm considering converting >> >> >all cmocka-based tests to cmocka-1.0 and don't compile the cmocka tests >> >> >at >> >> >all unless 1.0 or later is present on the system. It's not functionality >> >> >after all, "just" tests and for CI we could add cmocka-1.0 to the CI >> >> >system ourselves.. >> >> > >> >> >Opinions? >> >> +1 for patch. >> > >> >Does +1 for the patch also mean -1 for the proposal to *only* support >> >cmocka-1.0 and later? >> > >> >> I already see deprecated warnings. cmocka 1.0 is in f21 updates-testing >> > >> >Yes, btw Andreas would update libcmocka on all releases, including >> >private RHEL buildroots. So the "only" systems running pre-1.0 cmocka >> >would be non-RH distributions. >> > >> >For instance Ubuntu contains 0.4.. >> cmocka is optional dependency but we try to run CI build on debian testing. >> Debian testing (Jessie) is frozen since 2014-Oct-05. So we will need to wait >> for next debian release to have cmocka-1.0 in (next) Debian testing) >> >> If we agree we disable cmocka tests in our CI on debian >> I'm fine with support *only* cmocka-1.0 and later. > >I was proposing to build cmocka-1.0 from source on the Debian CI >machines. I haven't seen this proposal yet :-)
IMHO, it's reasonable compromise. If Nikolai agrees let's go with cmocka-1.0+ way LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
