5th patch)
+static void sdap_inherit_user_options(struct sss_domain_info *parent_dom,
+ struct sdap_attr_map
*parent_user_map,
+ struct sdap_attr_map
*child_user_map)
+{
+ int inherit_options[] = {
+ SDAP_AT_USER_PRINC,
+ SDAP_OPTS_USER /* sentinel */
+ };
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; inherit_options[i] != SDAP_OPTS_USER; i++) {
+ sdap_copy_map_entry(parent_user_map, child_user_map, i);
s/i/inherit_options[i] ?
No, the parameter is an integer.
Yes, it's integer - I'd expect that you want to call:
sdap_copy_map_entry(parent_user_map, child_user_map, SDAP_AT_USER_PRINC) rather
then sdap_copy_map_entry(parent_user_map, child_user_map, 0)
I don't see what's the point of values of inherit_options at all if the code
would be right...I'll have another look tomorrow with fresh eyes.
Jakub it must be a typo - I can't resolve user from subdomain with patches
applied, but if I do the proposed change resolving of subdomain users starts to
work.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
