On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm
>attaching a new version of the patch to review.
>
>> Does upstart/init script need to be updated as well?
>> We have some generic in src/sysv/sssd.in
>
>Upstart does need to keep track of the pidfile creation. I can't see a
>service file, so I'll prepare one.
>
>Regarding sysv, due to its sequential nature, it's dangerous to include
>an infinite loop because it could stuck the normal boot of the machine.
>I included a timeout in the loop to avoid this, please let me know what
>you think about it.
>
>> BTW the patch causes some failures for me on rhel6.
>> According to logs, the file /var/run/sssd.pid
>> did not exist in some cases.
>> 
>> Please also remove changes in src/sysv/systemd/sssd.service.in
>> in next version. For systemd only I would prefer "Type=notify".
>
>Done, I've switched to Type=notify for systemd.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Victor

>From 65f587535fae28719d3f2455fe144dd008361d52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Victor Tapia <victor.ta...@canonical.com>
>Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:01:32 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] Create pidfile after responders started
>
>---
> Makefile.am                      |  1 +
> src/monitor/monitor.c            | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> src/sysv/sssd.in                 | 11 +++++++++++
> src/sysv/systemd/sssd.service.in |  3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Thank you very much for updated version.

It will take me some time to test the patch.
But it's on my TODO list.

LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to