URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5910 Title: #5910: SPEC: avoid weak dependencies
sumit-bose commented: """ > > Please see my in-line comments. > > Thank you. I updated the patch. > > But what do you think about: > > > I'm not sure what to do with: > > ``` > > Recommends: bind-utils > > Recommends: adcli > > ``` > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bind-utils provides nsupdate used by IPA and AD backends, but SSSD can work > > without it. And adcli is used by AD backend to renew machine password. > > ? Hi, since the related features are enabled in SSSD by default it would be good if the two packages will be installed together with `sssd-ad` or `sssd-ipa`. But since both features can be disabled a user might want to removed those packages if not needed. So `Recommends` would be best. If I understood the original bugzilla ticket correctly we can keep `Recommends:` because neither `sssd-ad` nor `sssd-ipa` are in the `core` group (only `sssd-common` and `sssd-kcm` are). HTH bye, Sumit """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5910#issuecomment-992344439
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
