On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > On 06/11/2014 08:06 AM, Daniel Jung wrote: > > Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap > > > SSSD provides fast caching of users and groups similar to nscd. > For other maps you have to decide what tool is best. Nscd is an option > but we really want to hear about the reason why it is needed. > dnsmasq is a preferred solution for hosts.
Actually in Fedora we are proposing to install unbound by default as caching name server because it can do DNSSEC properly. So in general we favor a proper DNS caching daemon over nscd. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
