Thats very interesting. Have you seen noticeable improvement using outbound vs nscd from performance ?
Thanks On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > On 06/11/2014 08:06 AM, Daniel Jung wrote: > > > Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap > > > > > > SSSD provides fast caching of users and groups similar to nscd. > > For other maps you have to decide what tool is best. Nscd is an option > > but we really want to hear about the reason why it is needed. > > dnsmasq is a preferred solution for hosts. > > Actually in Fedora we are proposing to install unbound by default as > caching name server because it can do DNSSEC properly. > > So in general we favor a proper DNS caching daemon over nscd. > > Simo. > > -- > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York > > _______________________________________________ > sssd-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users >
_______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
