> On 24 Sep 2018, at 20:25, Simo Sorce <s...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 19:59 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:22:35AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> btw it’s a good question to ask why isn’t the check done on saving
>>>> the group. I thought it was and I see code that checks for ID
>>>> uniqueness and even a test..
>>> 
>>> In current code, saving would override data as if the group was renamed
>>> changed I think ?
>> 
>> The way the code is currently written is, if there is a duplicate:
>>    - check if the "new" group has the same SID, uniqueID or original DN
>>      as the "old" one
>>      - yes, same: this is a rename, allow
>>      - no, different: this is a duplicate, error
> 
> not sure how the original DN would match if you rename the object and
> that changes the DN too ?

Yes, in that case, the rename would throw an error. The originalDN handling was 
meant to support renames in the case the RDN doesn’t contain the name and 
therefore doesn’t change.

This is honestly something where I don’t know what is the right thing to do. If 
we detect that a group with some GID already exists, then how do we distinguish 
between “err, there are duplicates on the LDAP side” and “look, the group was 
renamed” without any peristent identifier like a SID? At the point the code was 
changed the last time we also thought about returning an error code from the 
sysdb save operation and then running an LDAP search by GID before deciding 
about rename or duplicate. But we also thought that a) a rename was not very 
common operation and b) because IPA and especially AD form the bulk of the 
deployments, we could go away with the SID or uniqueID helper..

Of course, if more people complain about group renames with a “plain LDAP” 
server, then we should implement the more complex logic, but my take at the 
time was that SSSD is complex as it is already, so I didn’t think it was worth 
adding a complex logic for a corner case.
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to