On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:37:58AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:02:25AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:23:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > Robin, the patch below breaks the build on the .36 kernel tree with the > > > following errors: > > > CC [M] drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.o > > > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c: In function ‘xp_remote_mmr_read’: > > > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c:40:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function ‘uv_gpa_to_soc_phys_ram’ > > > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function ‘uv_gpa_in_mmr_space’ > > > drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c:45:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function ‘gru_read_gpa’ > > > > > > Was there some other patch that I needed to apply to get this one to > > > work properly? > > > > I am sorry for this. I was embarrased when I saw the commit log. > > There were two minor patches immediately before c2c9f1 which needed to > > be applied as well. > > > > c2c9f115741453715d6b4da1cd2de65af8c7ad86 x86: uv: update XPC to handle > > updated BIOS interface > > 289750d1f1fd4a715baa2a2c6dd0cec2b8317fd7 X86: uv: implement a gru_read_gpa > > kernel function > > fae419f2abd15ab7d1cd1413e6683a276a4e14e2 x86: uv: introduce uv_gpa_is_mmr > > So those should be applied in backward order?
Those are in the order from git log, so yes, please. > If so, I'll get to that for the next .32 release after this one, it's > big enough as it is already :) That is wonderful. Thank you again, Robin _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
