2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>

commit 2234362c427e2ef667595b9b81c0125003ac5607 upstream.

Add missing unlocking of the wiphy in set_channel,
and don't try to unlock a non-existing wiphy in
set_cqm.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

---
 net/wireless/nl80211.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -758,11 +758,13 @@ static int nl80211_set_channel(struct sk
 
        result = get_rdev_dev_by_info_ifindex(info, &rdev, &netdev);
        if (result)
-               goto unlock;
+               goto unlock_rtnl;
 
        result = __nl80211_set_channel(rdev, netdev->ieee80211_ptr, info);
 
- unlock:
+       dev_put(netdev);
+       cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
+ unlock_rtnl:
        rtnl_unlock();
 
        return result;
@@ -4909,7 +4911,7 @@ static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct g
 
        err = get_rdev_dev_by_info_ifindex(info, &rdev, &dev);
        if (err)
-               goto unlock_rdev;
+               goto unlock_rtnl;
 
        wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
 
@@ -4926,9 +4928,10 @@ static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct g
        err = rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config(wdev->wiphy, dev,
                                             threshold, hysteresis);
 
-unlock_rdev:
+ unlock_rdev:
        cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
        dev_put(dev);
+ unlock_rtnl:
        rtnl_unlock();
 
        return err;

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to