On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 03:28:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > Apologies for my earlier mails; I fat fingered my git send-email run which I'd > really only intended for a dry-run. > > The following patch series is a backport of several changes to fix an XFS > stale data exposure issue in 2.6.32.y. This was assigned CVE-2010-2943. > > I verified this change using the provided reproducer (test 238 in xfsqa).
What about the rest of xfsqa - are there any new regressions introduced by the change? Probably most importantly, does xfsdump still work correctly? > The backport is mostly just offset adjustments, except for a locking change > in the second patch (2.6.32 still had the per-ag array). > > Christoph, Dave: are you ok with this backport for 2.6.32.y? Yes, but I just want to make sure that you've tested it adequatedly first. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner [email protected] _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
