On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 03:28:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > > > Apologies for my earlier mails; I fat fingered my git send-email run which > > I'd > > really only intended for a dry-run. > > > > The following patch series is a backport of several changes to fix an XFS > > stale data exposure issue in 2.6.32.y. This was assigned CVE-2010-2943. > > > > I verified this change using the provided reproducer (test 238 in xfsqa). > > Please do a full XFSQA auto group run to make sure the backport doesn't > regress anything else.
I did two runs w/ an unpatched kernel & two w/ the patch, and found no regressions. There are several tests that failed on both kernels and some tests that failed sporadically, regardless of the kernel. My test environment was a Debian/squeeze VM on my laptop, using 4G loopback files for the test/scratch filesystems. A list of past/fail runs is here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AjApGT0faJw7dFZBQ2M1QUVsMHpQMzR0Z3drQU82ekE&hl=en&authkey=CIno-6EB _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
