2.6.37-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

commit 5fe49d86f9d01044abf687a8cd21edef636d58aa upstream.

Early chipsets (gen2/3) used function 1 as a placeholder for multi-head.
We used to ignore these since they were not assigned to
PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA. However with 934f992c7 we attempt to bind to all
Intel PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY devices (and functions) to work in multi-gpu
systems. This fails hard on gen2/3.

Reported-by: Ferenc Wágner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ferenc Wágner <[email protected]>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28012
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -501,6 +501,14 @@ int i915_reset(struct drm_device *dev, u
 static int __devinit
 i915_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
+       /* Only bind to function 0 of the device. Early generations
+        * used function 1 as a placeholder for multi-head. This causes
+        * us confusion instead, especially on the systems where both
+        * functions have the same PCI-ID!
+        */
+       if (PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn))
+               return -ENODEV;
+
        return drm_get_pci_dev(pdev, ent, &driver);
 }
 


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to