2.6.37-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>

commit ceff1a770933e2ca2bf995b453dade4ec47a9878 upstream.

Commit 34aacb2920 ("procfs: Use generic_file_llseek in /proc/kcore") broke
seeking on /proc/kcore.  This changes it back to use default_llseek in
order to restore the original behavior.

The problem with generic_file_llseek is that it only allows seeks up to
inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes, which is 2GB-1 on procfs, where the memory file
offset values in the /proc/kcore PT_LOAD segments may exceed or start
beyond that offset value.

A similar revert was made for /proc/vmcore.

Signed-off-by: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/proc/kcore.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static int open_kcore(struct inode *inod
 static const struct file_operations proc_kcore_operations = {
        .read           = read_kcore,
        .open           = open_kcore,
-       .llseek         = generic_file_llseek,
+       .llseek         = default_llseek,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to