On 07/27/11 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote:
Andi, this patch is unnecessary.
It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and
14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by
e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream
Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too?
Yes.
So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other?
Or just drop?
Please drop it (and skip the other two that I mentioned above) and apply
e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470.
If yes why do the other ones not have Cc: stable marks?
That was a mistake on my part, sorry about this.
-boris
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
