On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:06:29PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 07/27/11 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote: > >>Andi, this patch is unnecessary. > >> > >>It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and > >>14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by > >>e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream > > > >Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too? > > Yes. > > > > >So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other? > >Or just drop? > > Please drop it (and skip the other two that I mentioned above) and apply > e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470.
Looks like I already had a revert and that one too. I dropped the patch+revert -Andi _______________________________________________ stable mailing list stable@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
