On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:54:48PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 May 2012 11:34:21 -0700
> > Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:19:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> > Sorry, forgot to Cc stable when the patch was sent to lkml
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This patch adds a new field to led_classdev to save activattion state
> >> > after activate routine is successful. This saved state is used in
> >> > deactivate routine to do cleanup such as removing device files, and
> >> > free memory allocated during activation. Currently trigger_data not being
> >> > null is used for this purpose.
> >> >
> >> > Existing triggers will need changes to use this new field.
> >> >
> >> > >From 3765101a5ffe32edd68a71bafca2d6d262cf2399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>
> >> What commit id is that for?
> >>
> >> > From: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
> >> > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:44:15 -0600
> >> > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] leds: add new field to led_classdev struct to save
> >> >  activation state
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't see this in Linus's tree, so what am I able to do with this?
> >>
> >
> > I have them queued for 3.5.  I didn't schule them for 3.4 or -stable
> > because I was given no reason to do so, nor did I see a reason myself.
> >
> > Shuah, we only add bugfixes to -stable trees.  I don't think this
> > patchset qualifies?
> >
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> Yes, this patch set definitely doesn't qualify under the bug fix
> category, however my hope is that, if it gets into stable kernels
> distros are picking up, maybe there is no need for staging area
> drivers such as timed-gpio and timed-output to be maintained.

Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for what is and is not
acceptable for stable kernel releases.  It's quite clear that "new
features" is not acceptable, don't you agree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to